David Lazer


2017

pdf bib
ConStance: Modeling Annotation Contexts to Improve Stance Classification
Kenneth Joseph | Lisa Friedland | William Hobbs | David Lazer | Oren Tsur
Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing

Manual annotations are a prerequisite for many applications of machine learning. However, weaknesses in the annotation process itself are easy to overlook. In particular, scholars often choose what information to give to annotators without examining these decisions empirically. For subjective tasks such as sentiment analysis, sarcasm, and stance detection, such choices can impact results. Here, for the task of political stance detection on Twitter, we show that providing too little context can result in noisy and uncertain annotations, whereas providing too strong a context may cause it to outweigh other signals. To characterize and reduce these biases, we develop ConStance, a general model for reasoning about annotations across information conditions. Given conflicting labels produced by multiple annotators seeing the same instances with different contexts, ConStance simultaneously estimates gold standard labels and also learns a classifier for new instances. We show that the classifier learned by ConStance outperforms a variety of baselines at predicting political stance, while the model’s interpretable parameters shed light on the effects of each context.

2015

pdf bib
A Frame of Mind: Using Statistical Models for Detection of Framing and Agenda Setting Campaigns
Oren Tsur | Dan Calacci | David Lazer
Proceedings of the 53rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 7th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (Volume 1: Long Papers)

2014

pdf bib
As Long as You Name My Name Right: Social Circles and Social Sentiment in the Hollywood Hearings
Oren Tsur | Dan Calacci | David Lazer
Proceedings of the Joint Workshop on Social Dynamics and Personal Attributes in Social Media